Eyes Open

topic posted Tue, January 6, 2004 - 4:39 PM by  Jun Julien
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
Being able to keep your awareness in the transition from waking state to dreaming state is quite similar to keeping your eyes open while going from what your doing to being distracted by something else. You usually miss the transition, miss the moment when you become posessed by the new moment and forget about the one you were in. When you're awake though, you remember easily (maybe after you hear some steps near your cubicle) that you're not doing what you should be doing and therefore you wake up to the reality of the distraction and maybe abandon it to go back to work. When you go from waking state into dreaming state however, it is rare to hear the steps of the gross realm that reminds us that we're dreaming and still stay in that dream with eyes open.

Those changes are quantum switches rather than smooth transititions, and those quantum switches seem to make us forget the underlying ground from which the world constantly arise and from which observe it, consciously, with mindful awareness.

If we represent the realm of our awareness as a circle of a particular radius it seems that sometimes the content of this circle changes abruptly as if there was a discontinuity in the fabric of reality itself. It is merely due to the fact that this circle doesn't have a sufficient radius that would allow us to realize that we just jumped from one layer to another but those layers are continually connected.

From a neural network perspective, it seems as if each spirit in us is potentially disconnected from it's neighbor, and the ability to stay aware through those quantum spiritual metamorphosis (usually by finding ground in Spirit which is the ground of them all) rely on our capacity to integrate those spirit/personalities in us in such a way that they don't ignore each other.

What is the nature of the usual awareness we have in the dream state? It doesn't seem that we have no awareness at all, it is just a "localized" awareness that doesn't know about the fact that it is hosted by, or sibling with, our waking consciousness. As soon as it remembers that waking consciousness, or the gross realm exists, it makes a major leap forward into integral consciousness.

What do you think?
posted by:
Jun Julien
France
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: Eyes Open

    Mon, January 19, 2004 - 5:16 AM
    I am not sure what you mean, but I will give it a try. I will put into my own words what I think you are saying, and see if it is right or not:
    OK, here goes. We are thinking we are this one person
    which is the one in this particular body born on a certain
    day at a certain place. But there we have an identity which
    takes in and is one with other beings who each have their
    own other identity ~the body they were born with on a
    certain day at a certain place.
    Now that's about as much as I go so far. I will have to read what you wrote again. But am I even warm?
  • Re: Eyes Open

    Mon, April 12, 2004 - 12:00 AM

    i've had experiences in "waking life" where suddenly i feel as though i am dreaming and just beginning to realize... i feel as tho i am on the verge of waking up. it's an interesting sensation to suddenly realize you are dreaming and take control.

    i believe practising the art of lucid dreaming mixed with dedicate meditative exercises focussing on awareness of sensation could help prolong these states.

    i believe as in the metaphor of the matrix we are all connected on the same level as we are all programs running on the same operating system. we have access to our own experiences but software can be installed to extend this access to the meta experience matrix..

    i've begun reading ken wilber these days and find the holonic paradigm and other things he has to say interesting.. also check out www.wie.org
    • Unsu...
       

      Re: Eyes Open

      Mon, April 12, 2004 - 2:12 PM
      do you really think you have control?
      • Re: Eyes Open

        Mon, April 12, 2004 - 3:24 PM

        perhaps taking control is the wrong terminology.

        what do you do when you are dreaming when suddenly you realize it is a dream? i generally try to fly. to me this is a kind of taking control but maybe you call it something else.
        • Unsu...
           

          Re: Eyes Open

          Mon, April 12, 2004 - 4:25 PM
          Just let it happen. It is much more fun :) Trust me on That. Even in dream you are trying to manipulate things.
          • Thought Consumption

            Tue, May 4, 2004 - 4:32 PM
            Give us elements to make us trust you! :-)
            Being conscious of manipulating your dream is a good start in my book. But I see your point, it's like in meditation, you see your thoughts and you let them pass by, and it is definitely fun to see how your mind produces thoughts without necessarily consuming them.
    • Re: Eyes Open

      Tue, May 4, 2004 - 4:45 PM
      Yup that's what I'm talking about. And I only had a few of those.
      And yes I believe that these states can be prolonged with practice too. In fact doesn't it make sense that if you're able to make your mind quiet and just witness your thoughts then you can be aware during the dream state without being sucked into whatever your mind produces? I remember my first lucid dream, I suddenly realized I was dreaming, and since I was reading Castaneda I remembered to look at my hands, which is a way to stabilize your dream body (I guess wilber would call that more of a psychic experience rather than a subtle experience, but I'm not entirely sure...) and I remember thinking " holy!$#@! I'm dreaming! ". It didn't feel like I was about to wake up at all. I then looked around, and a few seconds (dream-seconds?) after my consciousness was gone... Oops.

      Which book are you reading? The holarchical stuff is good I agree. The best stuff for me is the linking and integration of spiritual traditions and sciences. The four quadrants model is really powerful too. Thanks for the link, the dialog between Andrew Cohen and kw is a good one.

      Peace,

      Jun.
  • Unsu...
     

    Re: Eyes Open

    Mon, April 12, 2004 - 2:11 PM
    I don't think about things like that. I just see them. ahahaha
    • Re: Eyes Open

      Tue, May 4, 2004 - 4:26 PM
      Then tell what you see. he he he. Even though words and concepts are not too good at expressing this kind of experiences, it's worth trying to share isn't it? I can't be the only one making a fool of myself trying, can I? Maybe I can... :-O
  • Re: Eyes Open

    Thu, April 29, 2004 - 12:31 PM
    what about instead of being multi-layered, with each layer a seperate degree of awareness, it's more like a venn diagram, and we wade through different spheres of awareness? would that not fit more appropriately?
    • States or Structures? Spheres or Degrees?

      Tue, May 4, 2004 - 4:21 PM
      Indeed there seems to be overlapping areas between waking, dreaming and deep sleep, like in Venn diagrams. I was in my bath today going back and forth between waking and dreaming and trying to feel what was happening... It seems that the moment when I actually loose the continuity of my sense of self in the dreaming state is when my thoughts start to wander. It goes something like:
      - I'm awake
      - I feel the world disappear
      - There seems to be something unfolding, like if because the constraints of the material world has disappeared, the dream body can expand and fill consciousness with its energy.
      - Then I wake up, and I realize that I was dreaming but I got carried by a thought and lost my "lucidity". OOps

      Since in dream state the whole content of consciousness is subtle (emotions, thoughts, luminosities...) when a thought passes by and I identify to it, I simply loose track of what I'm trying to do: keeping my awareness from waking to dreaming. I've got more focusing practice to do... But to come back to the Venn diagram, if you think of the "bodies" existing in each sphere, then there seems to be some sort of layer topology. For instance in dream state, the physical body disappears from awareness, in deep sleep the "dream body" or subtle body, disappears from awareness also leaving only what Ken Wilber calls the causal. Whereas you can say that when you're awake, the subtle and the causal world are accessible to your awareness in that sense it seems to be more like layer. But I guess you could say that when resting in the causal for instance when you're in deep sleep, and assuming that you're also aware that you're in the causal, you can just start dreaminng or wake up, which gives you access to the subtle and causal worlds... Hmmm... I wonder.

      There I go and pick my "Eye of Spirit" page 261 to 265. Paragraph "The relation of structures and states". Wilber says that those three states (waking, dreaming and deep sleep) are accessible to anyone and they contain structures (or levels) of consciousness. He points out that the way we experience each state depends on the structures that have developed in the individual. Let me quote two paragraphs:

      "Evidence suggests that, under conditions generally of prolonged contemplative practice, a person can convert these temporary states into permanent traits or structures, which means that they have access to these great realms on a more or less continuous and counscious basis. In the case of the subtle realm, for example, this means that a person will generally begin to lucid-dream (which is analogous to savikalpa samadhi, or stable meditation on subtle forms); and with reference to the causal, when a person stable reaches that wave, he or she will remain tacitly conscious even during deep dreamless sleep (a condition known as permanent turiya, constant consciousness, subject permanence, or unbroken witnessing, which is analogous to nirvikalpa samadhi, or stanle meditation as the formless). Pushing even through even that level, the causal formless finds union with the entire world of form, a realization known as nondual (sahaja, turiyatita, bhava).

      In each of those cases, those great realms (psychic, subtle, causal, nondual) are non longer experienced merely as states, but have instead become permanently available patterns or structures of consciousness - which is why, when they become a permanent competence, I then call them the psychic level (or structure or wave), the subtle level, the causal level, and the nondual. The use of those four terms (psychic, subtle, causal, and nondual) to cover both structures and states has led some critics to assume that I was confusing structures and states, but this is not the case."

      After that he explains that structures develop in a stage-like manner, i.e. if you have stable access to the causal then you have stable access to the subtle but not vice-versa.

      I guess that the reason why I don't have stable access to the subtle it is because I still identify (exclusively) with my thoughts or emotions when they arise in my dreams. In other words, I'm in some way fascinated by them and I can't really take the necessary step back to allow my self to realize "Hey dude! I'm dreaming!".

      If I practice "stable meditation on subtle forms" then I'll be able to stop identifying exclusively with the subtle world (transcending it and including it) and I'll still have a lot of work with "stable meditation as the formless".

      I definitely makes sense now to me though, altough maybe temporarily: since I am not conscious during my dream, I can't really say that I'm myself in my dream. When I'll develop the ability to not be just caught in my emotions and thoughts, but disentify with them and watch them pass by (which happens to me sometime when I meditate, but not in a stable manner) then I'll access the dream state but with a different structure, which will allow me to stay conscious and experience this state as a deeper self. What's the point? Well that's for another post if anybody's interested.

      I guess that's why it's at the same time circles in the pond and good ole' stairway to heaven at the same time...

      Peace,

      Jun.
  • Re: Eyes Open

    Sat, October 16, 2004 - 10:04 AM
    What is the nature of the usual awareness we have in the dream state?

    - much the same as waking life

    It doesn't seem that we have no awareness at all, it is just a "localized" awareness that doesn't know

    - awareness never not knows

    about the fact that it is hosted by, or sibling with, our waking consciousness.

    - once you excercise your "localized" area of consciousness and this transition is experienced, you realize how it's all (were all) connected.

    As soon as it remembers that waking consciousness, or the gross realm exists, it makes a major leap forward into integral consciousness.

    - again, the transition can become smoother (and it works in reverse as someone else noted how you can "control" your dreams). Sub and Con are one, but they balance each other, Ego and Id same deal but it's not a "major leap" if your aware of the whole process.

    I hope this sounds sane.
    Peace
    HD

Recent topics in "IntegralFactory"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
Integral and Burning Man sean 0 May 8, 2009
1st Biennial Integral Theory Conference Obi-nine 1 April 19, 2008
chicago integral weekend Robert 0 February 7, 2006
Wilber Zaadz & Fantastic Taste Unsubscribed 0 January 31, 2006